You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
47 lines
1.4 KiB
47 lines
1.4 KiB
introduction:
|
|
- Functional Programming Hype
|
|
- Haskell => functional par excellence:
|
|
- examples
|
|
- learning curve extremely steep, both for syntax & paradigm
|
|
- Conclusion; Easier, more familiar (& verbose) introduction to FP needed:
|
|
- should not be "productive", but easy to learn FP
|
|
- Cleary state the goal; Educational language
|
|
- Why choose Go:
|
|
- Easy & familiar syntax (C)
|
|
- GC (Rust too complicated, though more powerful TS for FP)
|
|
- Existing Work:
|
|
- Talk by Francesc @ GopherCon; functional Go
|
|
- Downsides of Go:
|
|
- type system (polymorphism, sum types)
|
|
- no Lists
|
|
- no FP enforcement
|
|
- Examples to everything, possibly comparison to Haskell?
|
|
- TCO / benchmarking?
|
|
- Work to be done / mitigation:
|
|
- Powerful list implementation (polymorphic, supported by compiler) (Syntax TBD)
|
|
- FuncCheck (Rules TBD)
|
|
related_work:
|
|
- ???
|
|
-------- DONE --------
|
|
methodology:
|
|
- list functions implementation:
|
|
- plan, benchmarks, constraints & limitations, goal
|
|
- which functions:
|
|
- map (name? fmap?)
|
|
- prepend (similar to append, but way more expensive :-) )
|
|
- filter
|
|
- reduce
|
|
- zip
|
|
- funccheck:
|
|
- research "rules" for FP
|
|
- compare them
|
|
- create a curated list of rules
|
|
- implement those in a linter
|
|
- inspect results
|
|
application:
|
|
- ???
|
|
experiments_and_results:
|
|
- ???
|
|
discussion:
|
|
- ???
|