introduction:
  - Functional Programming Hype
  - Haskell => functional par excellence:
      - examples
      - learning curve extremely steep, both for syntax & paradigm
  - Conclusion; Easier, more familiar (& verbose) introduction to FP needed:
      - should not be "productive", but easy to learn FP
      - Cleary state the goal; Educational language
  - Why choose Go:
      - Easy & familiar syntax (C)
      - GC (Rust too complicated, though more powerful TS for FP)
  - Existing Work:
      - Talk by Francesc @ GopherCon; functional Go
  - Downsides of Go:
      - type system (polymorphism, sum types)
      - no Lists
      - no FP enforcement
      - Examples to everything, possibly comparison to Haskell?
      - TCO / benchmarking?
  - Work to be done / mitigation:
      - Powerful list implementation (polymorphic, supported by compiler) (Syntax TBD)
      - FuncCheck (Rules TBD)
related_work:
  - ???
-------- DONE --------
methodology:
  - list functions implementation:
      - plan, benchmarks, constraints & limitations, goal
      - which functions:
        - map (name? fmap?)
        - prepend (similar to append, but way more expensive :-) )
        - filter
        - reduce
        - zip
  - funccheck:
      - research "rules" for FP
      - compare them
      - create a curated list of rules
      - implement those in a linter
      - inspect results
application:
  - ???
experiments_and_results:
  - ???
discussion:
  - ???